RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Short-term follow-up of COVID-19 patients reveals pulmonary dysfunction, myocardial damage and severe psychological distress. Little is known of the burden of these sequelae, and there are no clear recommendations for follow-up of COVID-19 patients.In this multi-disciplinary evaluation, cardiopulmonary function and psychological impairment after hospitalization for COVID-19 are mapped. METHODS: We evaluated patients at our outpatient clinic 6 weeks after discharge. Cardiopulmonary function was measured by echocardiography, 24-hours ECG monitoring and pulmonary function testing. Psychological adjustment was measured using questionnaires and semi-structured clinical interviews. A comparison was made between patients admitted to the general ward and Intensive care unit (ICU), and between patients with a high versus low functional status. FINDINGS: Eighty-one patients were included of whom 34 (41%) had been admitted to the ICU. New York Heart Association class II-III was present in 62% of the patients. Left ventricular function was normal in 78% of patients. ICU patients had a lower diffusion capacity (mean difference 12,5% P = 0.01), lower forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity (mean difference 14.9%; P<0.001; 15.4%; P<0.001; respectively). Risk of depression, anxiety and PTSD were 17%, 5% and 10% respectively and similar for both ICU and non-ICU patients. INTERPRETATION: Overall, most patients suffered from functional limitations. Dyspnea on exertion was most frequently reported, possibly related to decreased DLCOc. This could be caused by pulmonary fibrosis, which should be investigated in long-term follow-up. In addition, mechanical ventilation, deconditioning, or pulmonary embolism may play an important role.
RESUMO
As the low clearance rate of plasmaseparation limits its use in the treatment of patients suffering from liver failure, sepsis or MOF, we intend to develop strategies for a plasmaseparation unit which increases plasmafiltration rates. Our first question focused on whether commercially available plasmaseparation filters, and in particular their membranes, are suitable for the inversion of blood and plasma compartments. This experimental study was performed using in vitro systems. Commercially available plasmafilters PF2000N (Gambro) and Plasmaflo (Asahi) were compared in both their normal operating mode with blood flow through the capillary lumen, and in the inverse mode. Inverse mode means that blood flows through the outer space of the capillaries while plasma was obtained from the lumen. Heparinised porcine blood (5 I.U./ml) was used in a heated, recirculating in vitro circuit. Our main results were that the normal use of both filter types Plasmaflo and PF2000N enabled maximal blood flows (Qb) of 200 ml/min and filtration rates (Qf) of 25-40 ml/min. Operating the filters in the inverse mode enabled Qb up to 500 ml/min and Qf up to 100 ml/min. Hemolysis, platelet counts and coagulation parameters did not differ significantly regardless of whether the normal or inverse mode was used. The tested plasmafiltration membranes appear to be suitable for use in inverse mode. Although in our experiments, hemocompatibility tests did not indicate severe problems induced by the module geometry, the development of a module specially constructed for blood flow outside of the hollow fibers appears to be necessary in order to minimise shunts and low perfusion areas.
